Why Sunderland must resist controversial Project Big Picture proposals in their current form

The first thing to say about 'Project Big Picture' is that in this guise, it has seemingly little to no chance of being implemented.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

While the proposal seems to have been largely backed by EFL clubs (though there have been some vocal dissenters), and clearly benefits the Premier League's 'big six', the remaining 14 top-tier clubs will surely prevent it.

The proposal, in essence, asks them to cede power to the clubs both above and below them. To give up valuable voting rights to fellow Premier League teams, while financially strengthening the Championship clubs who could replace them in a matter of months.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It appears destined to fail and yet it nevertheless remains a vital topic for debate for those with an interest in the game in general, as well as Sunderland’s short and long-term future. The need for a financial bailout in the EFL is severe (Project Big Picture’s biggest selling point is that it’s the first to simply be there, in writing), and so there can be no doubt our pyramid is heading for fundamental change in some capacity.

The game has been rocked by the explosive Project Big Picture proposalsThe game has been rocked by the explosive Project Big Picture proposals
The game has been rocked by the explosive Project Big Picture proposals

Where Sunderland stand on the Project Big Picture proposals is unclear.

Charlie Methven was yesterday quoted in Bloomberg, not necessarily supporting the proposals but hardly rejecting them out of hand, either.

“This is the first serious attempt that we have seen to answer the major strategic issues facing the football pyramid,” he said, before urging the Premier League and the Government to produce a proposal of their own.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"Because as the rest of us sit here trying to save clubs with big cost bases and almost no revenues,” he said, “they have spent three months doing precisely nothing to help except hold endless cozy meetings the only purpose of which seems to be to kick the can down the road, through the long grass and into a ditch, preferably never to be seen again.”

Fans have no indication as to whether they should take this as a club view.

Methven resigned from the board last year and is said, like Stewart Donald, to have stepped back from his day-to-day involvement.

Yet he still speaks publicly on club matters and though leadership has passed to Jim Rodwell and other members of the board, there has been no clarity or updates on key matters to supporters for months.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

That goes for the club takeover, still not discussed in any capacity, the financial impact of COVID-19, and the crucial positions at the club which are still vacant.

It perhaps underlines why even though there have been some seismic changes behind the scenes in recent months, many supporters remain steadfast in their view that only a change in ownership can make any fundamental difference.

Project Big Picture, without a doubt, has some genuinely revolutionary and fundamentally positive ideas that apply as much to Sunderland to the other sides in Leagues One and Two.

Firstly, there is the obvious short-term financial boost that would come from an injection of £250 million at a time when revenues are cripplingly low due to the pandemic.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Even more significant is the conversation, long overdue, that this has initiated surrounding parachute payments.

Under the Big Picture proposals, they will be abolished and the media revenue shared with the EFL will grow to 25%.

This, theoretically, would suit a Sunderland side stepping into the Championship. Particularly if accompanied by a salary cap in the second tier, it could reduce some of the eye-watering and totally reckless owner spending that we have seen in recent years.

It is clear why this would appeal to the current regime and certainly, it would make the step up less to the Championship less daunting than it currently appears.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

For the game more generally, reducing the gulf between the top-two tiers is a worthwhile endeavour that can help bring the game back from the brink financially.

In the long-term, though, these proposals are potentially ruinous for the clubs with big fanbases that for whatever reason, do not find themselves right in the top elechon of the Premier League at this particular moment.

This applies as much to an Aston Villa, a Leeds United or a Sheffield Wednesday as much as it does a Sunderland.

From the reduction of the Premier League to 18 teams, to the changing voting rights that would incluce a potential veto on any club takeover, this is a concerted attempt to cut the so-called 'big six' off from the rest of the pyramid.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It's an attempt to all but prevent another Leicester City-esque title triumph. An attempt, even, to prevent another club joining the pack in the way that Manchester City did after their transformative takeover in 2008.

Above all else, it also gives these clubs the power to gently row back on their financial commitments at any stage they deem necessary.

Another smaller but equally key point is the threat of flooding the EFL with loan players from Premier Legaue Academies. This would only exacerbate the stockpiling problem that has cut Sunderland's operation adrift from their competitors.

It may seem fanciful or naive right now to imagine a scenario in which Sunderland are again trying to push their way into the top half of the Premier League.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

That, though, should aways be the long-term goal for a club of this size and potential.

Any attempt to undermine that in the future should be resisted and for that reason, Sunderland surely cannot be in support of it in its current guise.

If it's the case that some of the financial proposals are seen as a starting point for talks, then that is a separate issue and some of them have worthwhile goals.

The power grab that comes with it, though, is bad for the game and bad for the Black Cats.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

That the issues seem remote to Sunderland in its current guise should be seen as irrelevant to anyone with a long-term interest in the club.

A message from the Football Clubs Editor

Hi, our aim is to provide you with the best, most up-to-date and most informative coverage of YOUR club every single day, home and away, 365 days a year.

This depth of SAFC coverage costs, so to help us maintain the high-quality reporting that you are used to from the football team at the Sunderland Echo, please consider taking out a subscription to our new sports-only package.

You'll find all the details at sunderlandecho.com/subscriptions/sports.

Your support is much appreciated.

Richard Mennear, Football Clubs Editor