Plans for ‘bungalow-style mobile homes’ for older people rejected for village site

Plans for ‘bungalow-style mobile homes’ to house older people in a village have been thrown out by council planners.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The homes were designed to be used as residential accommodation for those aged over-55.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

According to planning documents, the land also benefited from extant permission for residential development.

The land off George Street, Haswell, where the development was proposedThe land off George Street, Haswell, where the development was proposed
The land off George Street, Haswell, where the development was proposed

The new plans included a change of use of the land to accommodate mobile homes – with other elements of the site set to be controlled through a licence under The Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act (1960).

This included a boundary wall, lighting, the formation of concrete plinths and the construction of an internal access road.

A design and access statement, submitted with the plan, added the mobile homes would help meet demand for “additional relatively low cost single-storey accommodation for an ageing population.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

During consultation, seven public objections were lodged raising concerns including the impact on residential amenity and loss of privacy.

After considering all submissions, Durham County Council’s planning department refused the application on February 9,2021.

The main issues included the impact on neighbouring properties, drainage and ecology.

A decision report stated the development would have a “significant detrimental impact upon the amenity of existing residential dwellings in terms of appearing overbearing and from reduced privacy.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Planners added the application “failed to provide sufficient information to demonstrate that surface water could be satisfactorily managed” and would also “fail to deliver net biodiversity gain.”

Several mobile homes also failed to meet the required separation distances set out in council planning policy, which council planners said would lead to a loss of privacy and an “overbearing effect.”

The report went on to say: “In addition, it should be noted that the boundary wall is currently the subject of an enforcement notice that requires a reduction to [its] height down to 2 metres which if upheld (it is currently the subject of an appeal), would further expose the units and allow views between the caravans and existing dwellings.”

For more information on the application and planning decision, visit Durham County Council’s online planning portal and search reference: DM/20/03320/FPA

You can subscribe to this website and enjoy unlimited access to local news, information and puzzles online. With a digital subscription, you can read more than five articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Simply click ‘Subscribe’ in the menu.