Sunderland 2033: Draft plans for jobs, business growth, transport and housing in the city sent to Government after approval by councillors

Sunderland's local plan is on its way to government after winning majority backing from city councillors.

Sunday, 25th November 2018, 11:24 am
Updated Sunday, 25th November 2018, 11:45 am
Sunderland Civic Centre

The draft Core Strategy and Development Plan looks at jobs, business growth, transport links and housing needs in the city from now until 2033.

This includes building 13,410 more homes – with an average of 745 per year – alongside planning rules against takeaways and new facilities such as schools and doctors.

Coun Graeme Miller

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

A consultation on the plan also saw more than 6,000 responses and attracted controversy over setting aside green belt sites for future development.

On November 21, the plan was voted through by full council despite concerns by opposition parties who moved that the plan should be referred back to cabinet.

Leader of the council’s Conservative group, Robert Oliver, criticised the lack of specific responses to green belt concerns in the plan and issues of a “hollowed-out city centre”.

Speaking at Sunderland Civic Centre, he argued the Vaux site should be the “anchor of the revitalisation of the city centre” and private sector-led to help reduce “vulnerabilities” around relying  on public sector funding.

Coun Niall Hodson

He added the city needed broader leisure facilities, easier parking, improved transport links to Washington and more executive homes to encourage people to live and work in the city.

Leader of the council’s Liberal Democrat group, Niall Hodson, praised elements of the plan which focus on protecting historic buildings in the city centre.

On areas of public concern – including several disputes around the green belt – he noted the responses in the plan and changes made were “quite minimal.”

Other concerns included the lack of detail on Brexit preparations in the plan and the future of private investment on the Vaux site, given the council’s plans to relocate their civic centre to the site in future.

Council leader, Graeme Miller, agreed that Sunderland was “hollowed out” due to job losses in shipbuilding, steel and glass in the 1970s and 1980s with jobs migrating to the west of the city.

He stressed that Vaux site proposals would “fill out the city centre” with the site being large enough for a mixture of public and private sector investment.

The site, he explained, has one million sq ft of space, with proposals for the civic centre and the existing Beam development taking up less than half of the site.

He added that if the local plan wasn’t timetabled, delays could cost Sunderland’s economy millions of pounds over time.

“I don’t think it’s a price worth paying,” he added.

The plan follows consultation in June and July this year which  saw a further 8,272 comments from 2,151 individuals.

Following feedback, the plan reduced the number of green belt sites from 15 to 11.

This saw West Park, Glebe House Farm, Offerton and Peareth Hall, in Springwell, removed from the plan.

Despite these changes, concerns still remain about affected green belt sites.

Coun Denny Wilson said that Castle ward councillors would be voting against the plan over a site included in North Hylton.

Coun Anne Lawson, referencing a proposed 400-home development on green belt land in Penshaw, also criticised the lack of response to community concerns in the plan.

These include the potential impact on the environment and pressures on existing infrastructure, such as school places and services.

Following discussion, a vote to send the plans to the Secretary of State were approved by 47 to 16.

The local plan will be examined in public by an independent planning inspector next year and is set to return to full council in future.

Chris Binding, Local Democracy Reporting Service.