Decision on new Sunderland court building promised by June

A decision on plans for a new court building in Sunderland will be taken by June, a Goverment Minister has promised.

Tuesday, 6th March 2018, 3:59 pm
Updated Tuesday, 6th March 2018, 4:05 pm
Sunderland Magistrates' Court

Houghton and Sunderland South MP Bridget Phillipson and her Sunderland Central colleague Julie Elliott have been campaigning for a new Sunderland Centre for Justice to replace the city's ageing magistrates' court building for years.

Now they have secured a commitment from Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice Lucy Frazer MP that a decision will be made by June.

Bridget Phillipson

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

The minister made the commitment during today's Justice Questions in the House of Commons, when she was pressed by Bridget Phillipson to end the eight-year saga.

Later, she wrote to both MPs to confirm a decision will be made by June, following consideration of the viable options for meeting HM Courts and Tribunal Service’s future capacity requirements.

Bridget Phillipson has tabled more than 50 written and oral parliamentary questions to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) since 2010, holding meetings with Sir Oliver Heald QC MP in November 2016, his successor Dominic Raab MP in October 2017, and with Ms Frazer in January.

The MPs launched their campaign after Houghton Magistrates’ Court closed in 2011, on the understanding that a new modern courts complex was to be built in Sunderland.

Julie Elliott

Despite spending £2million of taxpayer money buying land and drawing up plans for a new Centre for Justice at Farringdon Row, the government has yet to take a final decision on the project.

Instead, the MoJ informed the MPs in December that the HM Courts & Tribunals Service Property Board had approved a proposal to integrate Sunderland County Court into the Sunderland Magistrates’ Court.

According to a Parliamentary Question tabled by Bridget Philipson in January, this proposal was not subject to public consultation since it did not require the transfer of work outside of the local area.

Another Parliamentary Question revealed that the cost of upgrading the existing Magistrates’ Court to accommodate tribunal, family and criminal court proceedings would be approximately £284,000.

Bridget Phillipson

This work is expected to be completed by May , at which point all courts proceedings in Sunderland will take place within a building that is over one hundred years old and the MPS say is not fit for purpose.

Speaking after today’s Justice Questions, Bridget Phillipson said: "Today in the Commons I raised the future of the Sunderland Courts estate for what felt like the umpteenth time.

"Despite spending £2million on land and plans for a new state-of-the-art Centre for Justice, six successive Courts Ministers have dodged a decision on this project over the last eight years.

"As a result of this dithering, the Ministry of Justice has now been forced to spend a further £284,000 on carrying out urgent repairs to the dilapidated Sunderland Magistrates’ Court.

Julie Elliott

"This is simply not good enough for victims or their families, which is why I urged the new Courts Minister today to put an end to this saga once and for all by giving the people of Sunderland a decision on the way forward.

"I welcome her commitment to set out a timetable for the redevelopment of the court estate, but after eight long years of dither and delay my colleague Julie Elliott will not let this matter rest."

Julie Elliott added: "Today’s announcement is welcome but we have been here before with this Tory government.

"In November 2016 the then Courts Minister promised a decision on the rebuild by the end of March 2017, yet in the end everything was kicked into the long grass.

"Instead of getting on with the construction of the modern courts facility we were promised, the Ministry of Justice then decided to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on urgent repairs to our 110-year old magistrates’ court.

"This additional spending could have been avoided if ministers had taken a decision on the proposals for a new Centre of Justice when we first raised this issue eight years ago.

"It’s high time that the government made a decision before there is any further cost to the public purse.

"Constituents should be assured that Bridget and I will hold ministers to their promises until the spades are in the ground."