Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Lumley Castle Hotel
Sponsored by
Chester-le-Street, www.lumleycastle.com
 
 
Thursday, 9th September 2010

Vaux site: New cash bid

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 February 2010
Regeneration bosses are bidding for Government cash to help transform the derelict Vaux site into a multimillion-pound development.
The bleak-looking Sunderland city centre site, pictured, is still owned by Tesco, but negotiations are continuing to get the land in public ownership.

This would allow Sunderland City Council, Sunderland arc and other partners to create a multimi
llion- pound mixed-use development creating 3,000 jobs.

Hotels, civic buildings, city centre office space, leisure facilities, retail units and homes are all earmarked for the development – which could be linked to Stadium Village via a new pedestrian bridge over the Wear.

A funding package has already been agreed which will allow them to buy the site, if and when the long-running dispute ends in a successful outcome for the arc.

The agency is busy choosing a developer to work on the site and has now applied for cash from a new Government loan scheme to help fund the development.

Under the scheme, Vaux would be designated an Accelerated Development Zone (ADZ) and could potentially win tens of millions in funding which would be paid back through increased business rates.

There have been dozens of bids for the ADZ scheme from around the country, and it is not clear how many will be approved – or how much cash the scheme would get. Newcastle hopes to raise £50million from the scheme.

City leaders say they are close to reaching a deal with Tesco on the Vaux site.

It is hoped the firm will release Vaux if it gets planning permission to build on the run-down Sunderland Retail Park in Roker instead.

But the council and the arc have taken flak from critics, in particular Sunderland Conservatives, who say the process is taking too long at a time when the city is in desperate need of jobs and investment.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 February 2010 9:59 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Sunderland
 
Prev
1
Next
1

AXXX,

Sunderland 08/02/2010 14:23:15
It makes me laugh that every article that has something to do with the Vaux Site has a statement from the council who say 'they are close to a deal with Tesco about the sale of the site'

They have been saying this for the last 10 years and to be quite frank its pathetic - the people of sunderland have put up with this rubbish for far too long we DESERVE a city centre we can be proud of and 3000 jobs is urgently needed for our city!!!

THE TIME TO GROW SOME AND GET IT SORTED IS NOW SUNDERLAND COUNCIL, ITS BEYOND A JOKE AND IS HOLDING OUR CITY BACK FROM BECOMING SOMETHING MORE...
2

Jane Rigsby,

Fulwell 09/02/2010 10:42:45
Very ambigious article indeed. Why were are they no quotes from or names for these "city bosses" who are stating a deal with Tesco for the Vaux site is close? We can assume that no progress has been made and is not likely to be or some Labour councillor would be mentioned taking the credit.
3

Wearbetter,

Sunderland 15/02/2010 22:18:18
Cut out the middle man - get rid of the ARC. This whole Vaux saga is strung out to keep them in jobs while everyone else loses theirs, and great swathes of the city are laid waste. Look at the ARC '08/'09 report - £637000 wage bill for 16 ARC staff - or £39816 on average for each of them - not quite representative of the city's average wage. Their reported record of job creation since 2002 - less than 5% of the target to date. Our council tax already pays for qualified experts within the council to undertake regeneration - let them get on with it.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.