Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Lumley Castle Hotel
Sponsored by
Chester-le-Street, www.lumleycastle.com
 
 
Thursday, 18th March 2010

600 protest to get phone mast felled

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 November 2008
More than 600 people have signed a petition calling for the removal of a mobile phone mast in Fulwell.

The post, operated by O2, stands at the corner of Newcastle Road and Thompson Road, and parents say it is too close to Fulwell Grange Kindergarten and High View Nursery.

Lisa Black, from Rydal Mount, Fulwell, has been fighting to have the mast removed since 2007.

She said parents were worried about the long-term health effects the mast could have on their children.

The Department of Health and the Mobile Operators Association has said in the past that mobile phone masts in Britain conform to international safety standards.

But campaigners and some researchers claim emissions from the masts can cause cancer, damage the immune system or lead tohealth problems.

"There are many young families living close to this mast who feel, as I do, that this mast is far too close to these nurseries and our homes," said Lisa, who has two children.

"The Government guidelines state that no mobile phone mast should be sited close to a nursery, yet this mast is within 80 metres of two, a clear breach of these so-called guidelines.

"Other masts in the area have been upgraded and larger ones constructed. We don't want to see this happening here, and we want it moved."

Lisa presented the petition to Southwick councillor Norma Wright and it has now been submitted to council officers.

A spokesman for O2 said all its sites conform to very strict public exposure guidelines and often operate hundreds, if not thousands, of times below guideline levels.

He added that a World Health Organisation fact sheet published in 2006 said from all the evidence accumulated so far, no adverse short or long-term health effects have been shown to occur from the RF signals produced by base stations.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 November 2008 2:44 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Sunderland
 
Prev
1
Next
1

J Elliott,

Bristol 26/11/2008 08:27:41
Wrong O2 spokesman. 80% of WHO research proves that this technology is not safe. Over 2000 independent studies, linking phone mast electro magnetic radiation with serious ill health including cancer, confirm that phone masts should not be sited within 350 metres of schools or housing. Numerous studies have proved that melatonin, the cancer fighting hormone, is suppressed by this pulsing radiation. That's why the cancer clusters continue to increase in the vicinity of phone masts. Phone operators dismiss such research, alleging that their own studies suggest no health risk. However last year the national press revealed that a phone operator covered up the damaging results of their own research. The Ecolog Institute, a research organisation which examines the health effects of mobile phones, was commissioned to investigate the possible health risks of mobile phone masts. The 2003 Ecolog report confirmed:

'Given the results of the present epidemiological studies, it can be concluded that electromagnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer. This is particularly notable for tumours of the central nervous system.'

O2's attempts to persuade us that these mast microwave emissions are safe are a smokescreen. These international guidelines were only designed for one thing. To protect the Industry and their profits! The ICNIRP international guidelines, trumpeted by government and phone operators as providing protection to the general public from phone mast electro magnetic radiation emissions, were introduced in 1992 in the technology's infancy. They were introduced not by scientists, but by technicians. They completely ignored researching the most damaging effects to the human body of these radiation emissions, i.e. measuring the biological, vibrational effects on the human body and damage to cells. They only researched the thermal (heating) effects of the emissions on dead meat! This absurdity is al
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.